Here is the report from the tutorial from 31 July for part 2 of BoW.
Two items here for reference, the rest in the document below:
Project proposal (if any change) (student)
To refocus towards the attention on process and material shifts rather than taking performance as key to the project.
To explore drawing/contact within the parameters of the methodology that I have already begun to articulate and test and experiment with a view to gain an understanding on:
- expectations of the work
- digital and analogue forms of these
- the types of relationships between objects and the overall container, holding framework, assemblage of the work
Critical Reflection (space to critically reflect on the work across both units) (student)
Role of concepts of near space, site and moving-with to create a terminology to describe a performative action (of drawing in an expanded field)
>> the methodology for the project needs further unpacking and articulating: where does it come from and where does it reach.
>> here the glossary that Rachel suggested for Research is indeed useful (possibly to explore and make connections, to refine – not necessarily to define down) [I am thinking of e.g. Raymond Williams’ Keywords].
BoW then would become the place where I figure out practically what the methodology is for the ideas concerning near space, drawing/contact and moving-with.
Part of my own reflections (and which didn’t come into the report) are here: tutorial reflections 1: what is (source) material?